<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>The Metamorphosis on The Kafka Project</title><link>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/</link><description>Recent content in The Metamorphosis on The Kafka Project</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:20:27 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Reading for Constructions of the Unspeakable: Teaching Kafka’s Metamorphosis</title><link>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/reading-for-constructions-of-the-unspeakable-teaching-kafka-s-metamorphosis/</link><pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2004 18:20:27 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/reading-for-constructions-of-the-unspeakable-teaching-kafka-s-metamorphosis/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Margaret Sönser Breen&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Introduction&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of the most challenging issues confronting secondary and university teachers is how to teach subjects that have been labelled “off limits,” either by school boards or institutional policies or, more pervasively if vaguely, by cultural norms. Discussions of non-normative or minority genders and sexualities are for this reason muted or silenced within educational contexts, ironically the very contexts ostensibly committed to social change and betterment. Teachers are often caught in a battle between idealism and pragmatism: how is one to afford students opportunities for thinking about such typically unspeakable matters as non-normative genders or sexual practices if, in doing so, teachers face the very real risk of not being tenured or of losing their jobs?
In this paper I consider the importance of training students to recognize that the construction of meaning through language, whether in literature or culture at large, is a political process that renders certain subjects legitimate and others illegitimate. I begin by briefly examining one of the most disturbing contemporary examples of language as political process: American (U.S.) rhetoric immediately following the September 11 attacks. This rhetoric works to identify and de-legitimate various cultural subjects as subjects; in effect, subjects become “others.” So, for example, in the rhetoric produced post September 11, women, gays and lesbians, Muslims, and Arabs were all variously deemed “suspect” subjects, capable of threatening dominant social norms. Discussion of contemporary examples of the rhetorical production of cultural “others” serves as a useful segue for an analysis of literary texts or, more particularly, for moments in literature engaged in censoring their subjects or transforming those subjects into something improper or suspect.
The literary text on which I focus is Kafka’s 1915 novella, The Metamorphosis. A chilling tale of how social policing and surveillance work to silence accounts of gender (as well as racial and sexual) transgression, The Metamorphosis offers students an allegory for the dehumanizing social construction of non-normative groups. My paper argues that by reading texts (in this case specifically Kafka’s novella) as fundamentally political, as offering representations of various ways in which populations are controlled, the teacher provides students with an epistemological framework not only for recognizing constructions of the unspeakable in their lives but also for identifying the pedagogical dilemma of how to teach what may not be taught-the “don’t ask, don’t tell” power play of an ostensibly “open” society-that so many teachers face. Reading for the construction of the unspeakable (the suspect subject) works then, ultimately, to radicalize the educational process for students and teachers alike within a society fueled at least in part by various forms of prejudice such as homophobia and heterosexism.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Essays about The Metamorphosis</title><link>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/essays-about-the-metamorphosis/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 20:52:04 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/essays-about-the-metamorphosis/</guid><description>&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;An extensive collection of essays and student papers is available in the Special Issue on &lt;a href="https://www.kafka.org/help/metamorphosis/"&gt;The Metamorphosis&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;</description></item><item><title>Kafka~Samsa. Reality Through Symbolism</title><link>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/kafka-samsa-reality-through-symbolism/</link><pubDate>Thu, 11 Nov 2004 10:08:21 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://www.kafka.org/archive/essays/published/metamorphosis/kafka-samsa-reality-through-symbolism/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Robbie Batson&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is unusual to say the least to open a book and the first line is about the main character waking up as a large insect. Most authors’ use symbolism to relate the theme of their work, not Franz Kafka. He uses a writing method that voids all aspects and elements of the story that defy interpretation. In doing this, he leaves a simple story that stands only for an objective view for his own thoughts and dreams. Kafka focuses the readers’ attention on a single character that symbolizes himself and his life, not Everyman as some authors do. This method is displayed in most of his literary works. To understand how this method is recognized, readers must study the author’s background during the period of writing and basic history to understand this author’s motive. In his short story, “The Metamorphosis”, there are multiple similarities between Kafka’s true life and Gregor Samsa’s.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>